Mert Naci Turker vs Marvin Greven Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Turker vs Greven analysis and find out who is favored!
Mert Naci Turker vs Marvin Greven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Turker 1 - 0 Greven
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Turker has won 51.32% of points on his second serve, while Greven has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Turker, in recent form, has won 53.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Greven has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.91% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Turker has saved 54.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Greven has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Turker has won 65% of matches played (W/L 26/ 14), with Greven winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Turker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 112/ 117), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Greven has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 36/ 39), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Turker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14), where as Greven has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Turker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Turker winning 2 and Greven winning 0. The last match between Turker and Greven was at the Turkey F43 (Antalya), 13-11-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Mert Naci Turker getting the victory 7-5 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Turker and Greven have played a deciding set 0 times, with Turker winning 0 times and Greven 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Turker winning 1, and Greven 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Turker has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.95 while Greven has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Turker has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Greven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Turker has converted 45.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Greven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Turker 1 - 0 Greven
Mert Naci Turker
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
Marvin Greven
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
47% (144-163)
Career Total W/L
42% (38-53)
68% (19-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,750
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mert Naci Turker | Marvin Greven |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-6(2) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mert Naci Turker | Marvin Greven |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 68% (19/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (40/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (329/244) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 68% (19/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
Aces Total | 22 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:14:30 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 160.75 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (795/1303) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 66% (524/795) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (261/508) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (71/150) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (578/1315) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 68% (19/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (19/28) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 94% (18/17) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 6% (18/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mert Naci Turker Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Mert Naci Turker
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
5 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
QF |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Patrick Jozwicki
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Adam Bajurko
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Mert Naci Turker
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
117)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Unknown Player
39%
(
15 of
38)
1st Serve %
83%
(
30 of
36)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Marvin Greven Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marvin Greven
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
40)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Tobias Simon
Player
Marvin Greven
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
14
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Luca Giacomini
Player
Marvin Greven
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more